With things falling apart the way they did at Copenhagen and the Australian governments lack of serious action on climate change, 2009 wasn’t the best of years on the climate change front.

Copenhagen illustrated that our political leaders are clearly not up to the job of ensuring a safe climate and future for humanity.

Over the past few weeks I have come to this conclusion – if things are going to change, then it is up to us to change them. By ‘us’ I mean you, me and ordinary everyday people from all over the planet.

I mean people like Jeanne Versmissen-Adriaans who kindly translated the ‘Solving global warming’ mind map into Dutch so she could spread the word in the Netherlands.

I mean people like my friend George Crisp who hosted ‘Age of Stupid’ movie nights for his friends several nights in a row, blogs regularly about climate change, writes letters to the editor every week and is trying to green doctors surgeries.

Sure, you may be thinking that translating a mind map or showing a documentary on climate change to your friends and family may not seem like much, but how else are we going to create the groundswell of awareness and action that is required to solve this ecological crisis?

I am a firm believer that all these little actions add up and make a difference. The more people have climate change in their faces, the better.

Author George Monbiot stated after things fell apart at Copenhagen:

“So what happens now? That depends on the other non-player at Copenhagen: you. For the past few years good, liberal, compassionate people – the kind who read the Guardian – have shaken their heads and tutted and wondered why someone doesn’t do something. Yet the number taking action has been pathetic. Demonstrations which should have brought millions on to the streets have struggled to mobilise a few thousand. As a result the political cost of the failure at Copenhagen is zero. Where are you.”

Where will you be in 2010? What will you be doing to ensure a safe climate for future generations?

I recently had some Italian friends come and stay with my family and I. We had a great two weeks together and I asked them if they wouldn’t mind translating the ‘Solving global warming’ mind map for me and they kindly agreed!

Here is what we came up with (click on image to enlarge):

I think they may have felt slightly uncomfortable translating the ‘Don’t Fly’ section of the mind map given they were going to be getting on a plane in a couple of hours! Despite their discomfort I really appreciate that they took the time to translate this mind map. Thanks so much Alessio and Sabrina!

I was really excited to receive an email from a Chinese group who had translated the global warming mind map into mandarin. Check it out!

Just imagine what would be possible with 1 billion people (one sixth of the world’s population) taking the suggested actions on the mind map (eat less meat, walk instead of drive, etc.)

I have been receiving some angry comments recently about the ‘Have no more than 2 children’ branch (somehow I don’t think the Chinese will struggle with this given their one child policy). One man, Joey, sent me a message declaring “I will have as many kids as I want thank you very much”. That’s fair enough, you can have as many kids as you want, but before you do, let’s consider the earth for a moment. With its limited resources, limited space, how much can the earth handle? If everyone is having as many kids as they want like Joey, could this be a problem?

Population is the elephant in the room which nobody talks about. As Joey has illustrated, it’s a very touchy subject. I wrote a chapter in my ebook on overpopulation and I have pasted it below. I hope it helps to explain why I have created a ‘Have no more than 2 children’ branch. It’s not because I’m evil and don’t like children. Far from it. It’s because I care about the planet and the millions of other species that inhabit it (humans included).

CHAPTER 4

TOO CLOSE FOR COMFORT: OVERPOPULATION

In the last 200 years the population of our planet has grown exponentially, at a rate of 1.9% per year. If continued at this rate, with the population doubling every 40 years, by 2600 we would all be standing literally shoulder to shoulder.
– Professor Stephen Hawking

Global warming is a by product of a bigger, more serious issue: overpopulation. One doesn’t need statistical proof to see that the world is getting crowded. We can see it clearly in our day to day lives as we struggle to find a parking spot at the shopping
centre, wait months for a doctors appointment and see oceans of new, compact suburbs springing up all around us.

Let’s take a look at the facts. For the majority of the two million years of human history, the population was less than a quarter of a million. It took thousands of years (until 1800) for the population to reach the first billion. In 1930 the population reached 2 billion, 3 billion in 1960, 4 billion in 1974, 5 billion in 1987 and 6 billion in 1999. According to the United Nations projections, the population is predicted to reach an astronomical 9.1 billion by 2050. What’s going on? Why is our population growing so out of control? The simple answer is exponential growth. Sounds complex? Well, it isn’t.

In a nutshell, exponential growth is based on the idea that the larger a number gets, the faster it grows. This principle can be explained by looking at a child receiving his or her pocket money. The child is given two choices for increasing their weekly pocket money. The first choice is to start with $1 worth of pocket money and have this doubled every week. The second option is to start on $5 and have this increase by $1 every week.

Option 2 may give you more in the short term, however as you can see in the table above Option 1 eventually will grow much larger. We may not realise it but what is happening with the simple example of the child’s pocket money in Option 1 is what is happening with the Earth’s human population (but on a much larger scale).

Imagine that you are reading the paper and the front page states ‘Population increases by 1.8% every year’. Would you be alarmed? Probably not. Many of us would think ‘1.8%? That’s nothing!’ and we would flip straight through to the sports or comic section. Don’t be fooled though. According to Dr Albert A. Bartlett (Professor of Physics at the University of Colorado) this is an alarming figure. If the population was to continue increasing by this amount ever year then it would only take 780 years for the world population to grow to a density where there would be one person per square metre on the dry lands surface.

Stop for a moment and try to picture living in a world like that. Quite uncomfortable? Distressing? It would be like living in a crowded lift that you cannot escape from. How do people react when they are in confined spaces? Some people remain calm and cool headed, whilst others freak out and reason and common sense go out the door. They do irrational things that not only harm themselves but the people around them. With a population growing exponentially this is what is likely to happen to our planet. Professor Bartlett also states it would only take 2,400 years for the mass of the people to equal the mass of the earth (with a 1.8% growth rate in population)! Eventually we would reach a point where people could not go on living with such limited space. Something needs to change and if we don’t try to change, mother earth will do it for us.

Hurting the world

Having more people results in a tragedy of the commons situation. To explain this concept, let’s take a quick look at the overfishing of the fishery. A fisherman thinks ‘If I don’t take these fish then someone else will, so I better take as much as I can!’, but what then happens is that everyone has this mentality and starts taking as much fish as they possibly can! You end up with a dead, empty ocean with no fish at all. Perhaps Professor Elinor Ostrom’s quote below from Governing the Commons says it best:

Wealth that is free for all is valued by no one because he who is foolhardy enough to wait for its proper time of use will only find that it has been taken by another…the fish in the sea are valueless to the fisherman, because there is no assurance that they will be there for him tomorrow if they are left behind today.

The tragedy of the commons situation that is occurring in the fishery is taking place all over the world with other natural resources (i.e. water, forests, exotic species and oil). Global warming, deforestation, pollution of air, soil and water are the result of overexploiting the Earth’s resources to meet the demands of a growing population. More people on the planet means there is less water, food, energy and space to go around. There will be even less finite natural resources to go around in the western world now that developing countries like China are following in our larger carbon and ecological footprints (China recently overtook the U.S. as the world’s biggest CO2 emitter).